|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
And here’s November. I’m going to hold off on posting December until tomorrow sometime as I’m finding myself unable to commit to a final POTD of the year until the night is over. Happy New Year’s Eve everyone!!
I’m spending some time on this last snowy day of 2009 finishing up my Project 365 posts. This is the month of October, a pivotal time of the year for me. It starts with the second half of the move from San Francisco, through the start of my new job here in Boston. Today’s the day my flickr pro account expires. Thirteen months ago I mentioned when I hit 10,000 views. As of this morning I’m at 57,000. How can I not renew with quantification of self-worth like that? It’s a funny time we live in, when everyone I meet is certifiably ADHD, no one (myself included) can make it through a meal without the omnipresent iPhone coming out for this or that time&soul-sucking reason, and the briefest snippets of anonymous attention is the only currency that matters. That and comments. Leave comments. BTW, I’m still making moderate success in my “world’s cutest husky” spam campaign. I get quite a few hits through google image search on that term, but recently got my first through yahoo image search (which I wasn’t really aware existed). As of this posting, Maija is one picture short of being EVERY SINGLE PHOTO on the front page of results for that term. It’s the little things, you know. Inspired by mapping capabilities of my new phone, I spent some time geocoding a bunch of my photographs on flickr this morning, tagging about 20% of them with location information. You can see the results on this map (though, I think if San Francisco is visible in the frame, hitting the green refresh at the bottom won’t bring up locations further afield even when you’re zoomed out). I’m sure best practice for this would be to add this information to EXIF metadata prior to uploading but it’s a little too late to think about that now. Going forward, the really right way to do this is in camera with a GPS, but that requires a really clunky hot shoe add-on like this these days. Here’s hoping the next generation SLRs will have this feature built in. A couple of things I’ve noticed about this. First, there’s probably a quarter of my collection that doesn’t really need to be geotagged. Indoor shots of inanimate objects, random things inside my friend’s apartments aren’t really what anyone searching on a map would be looking for. I’m contemplating sticking those shots in the middle of the ocean just to get them out of my way as I work through the non-geotagged bin. Second, Yahoo Maps is really frustrating to use, it feels several generations stupider than Google Maps. It turns out to be much faster and easiest (if clunkier) to do the searching in Google in a second tab, then copy/past the address I find there into the map tab of the Flickr Organizer. Also, what’s with all the clouds? Below is what I see when I try to place my stuff from my Plymouth set. Yikes. It’s all under there somewhere, I guess. This kind of thing has come up a couple of times.
One thing I like about the whole 365 concept is it serves as a defacto memory bank for stuff about my own life I’d otherwise forget immediately. My May selections cover some big-for-me stuff, 48 hours in Boston, our road trip up to Ukiah & the old people’s visit to San Francisco.
PS. Full set on flickr. Six month’s ago my flickr photostream reached ten thousand hits. Today I noticed it crossed the thirty thousand views mark (currently, 30,067). That’s roughly 100 views a day since October, and it wouldn’t be honest if I denied deriving some amount of satisfaction from the fat roundness of those numbers. I’m sure this is rounding error compared to some people but I have depressingly realistic expectations. I was poking around at the bottom of my stats page and noticed of the roughly two thousand photos in my stream, I have ten with zero views. I’m not sure which ten – when I tried to sneak my way to the least popular by guessing URLs for the most views page I got down to a bunch of ‘one view’ shots, the last of which was the grass photo above. It’s a crap throwaway macro, but on some level I like it because I remember the context of posting it – NP and I were walking around at the Charles watching the regatta, taking pictures and shooting HOCR. My most popular recent photo (likely due to it’s mild salaciousness) is this one of sexy coneheads from Yuri’s Night. Flickr deems my most “interesting” photo overall to be this one of maija from leaf-raking day back in Burlington. I’m not so sure about that – I think there are better ones of her since we’ve gotten to California. At any rate, 30K. It’s like playing the stock market, but monotonically increasing! Definitely the highlight of my day. Photoshop Express, a free web-based (& Flash 9 driven) photo editing and gallery service was released today. This program lets the user make minor modifications to a photo either hosted by Adobe (each user has 2GB of storage to work with) or on Facebook, in a Picasa web album or on Photobucket. Some qualms based on an hour worth of playing with this:
The issues I have with Photoshop Express are for the most part problems of presentation rather than function. If you think of this more of just an editing tool than as an actual photo sharing platform on par with Flickr or Picasa (or hell, Dropshots), Photoshop Express may have a chance to be useful rather than just shiny. Granted that all the edits you can make here are of the type one could otherwise quickly make in the free desktop Picasa, but once your photos are already online, this may be the best option for tweaking. If you want to see the test album I created with some hevelonian shots that’s here. The original on which the purple facade above was based is here. Steve’s heading to California, not to see VCbut to move a car back east with one of his friends. I’m using that as an excuse to test out the “Blog This” feature from flickr, with a Golden Gate shot from one of his last trips West. If you follow the photo stream, there’ll be a NSFW nude dude surprise. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Copyright © 2010 quasify - All Rights Reserved |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recent Comments